Author: cad256

From Critique to Revision: Teaching Iteration in Visual Work

cad256Leave a comment

From Critique to Revision: Teaching Iteration in Visual Work

-Cookie Redding, CPAD Faculty

 

 

Critique day ends. And then what?

In many creative courses, critique becomes the peak moment. Students present their work, the class discusses it, and then the project is over. But if we stop there, we miss one of the most important stages of creative development. Revision is where growth happens. It is where ideas become clearer, where technical skills sharpen, and where confidence begins to build through deliberate effort.

In visual arts, design, and studio-based disciplines, iteration is not just a technique. It is a way of thinking. Teaching students to return to their work with purpose, to revise and rework based on what they have seen and heard during critique, is essential. But to teach revision well, we need to make space for it. If critique is where students learn to see, then revision is where they learn to respond.

Revision matters because it mirrors how creative work happens in professional practice. Designers rarely deliver a first draft to a client and call it finished. Artists often revisit pieces over time or explore multiple versions of the same idea. Architects move through stages of sketch, feedback, model, and rebuild. This cycle of working, sharing, reflecting, and adjusting is the core of creative problem solving. It shows that strong work is not about natural talent alone. It comes from staying with the process.

In many courses, students do not revise simply because the course does not make room for it. If one assignment ends and the next begins right away, students are unlikely to carve out time for deep reworking. To support meaningful iteration, the course timeline should include space after critique for revision. Even one class session devoted to reworking can encourage students to engage with feedback instead of filing it away.

It also helps to include revision as part of how the project is evaluated. When students know that reflection and revision are part of the grade, they treat it as something real. You do not need to assess it in a rigid way. A short explanation of what they changed, a comparison of draft and final, or a simple reflection can be enough to shift the focus. Ask students to explain what feedback they chose to incorporate and why. Encourage them to think about what stayed the same and whether that was a conscious choice. This kind of reflection supports growth without becoming formulaic.

It is also important to frame critique itself as a beginning, not an ending. Many students think of critique as a judgment. If the room likes their work, they feel finished. If the feedback is mixed, they feel defeated. Shifting the language of critique from verdict to process can help. Feedback is material. It is something to work with, not something to fear. Students should feel invited to use critique as a jumping-off point. That means they can make changes, challenge ideas, or take their work in new directions based on what they heard.

Revision does not always mean starting over. Sometimes it is about refining. In visual work, this might mean adjusting a composition, refining use of type, changing color choices, revisiting a concept, or strengthening visual hierarchy. It might mean cropping an image for clarity, simplifying a layout, or changing the sequence of elements. Students should be encouraged to revise in ways that support their intention. Revision is not about pleasing the instructor or guessing what would earn more points. It is about strengthening the communication and clarity of the work.

Reflection supports this process. When students revise, they should be encouraged to think about what they changed and why. They can be asked to describe the specific decisions they made and what influenced those decisions. They can compare the final version to the earlier one and explain how it evolved. They might reflect on how the process felt and what they learned about their own way of working. This turns revision into more than a task. It becomes a way of learning.

Over time, revision becomes a habit. The more students are exposed to it, the more they begin to use it naturally. They start to sketch before jumping in. They try different variations. They revise early drafts without being told. They take feedback seriously because they see how it helps. This is the goal. When students revise not because they are told to, but because they understand the value, they are thinking like artists and designers.

As instructors, we can support this by sharing our own process. Show unfinished work. Talk about what changed between version one and version two. Let students see that revision is part of your practice too. When students see revision modeled by the people teaching them, they begin to internalize it.

It also helps to acknowledge that revision takes time, energy, and trust. Not every revision will be dramatic. Sometimes the changes are small. What matters is the awareness behind the choice. Teaching revision does not mean expecting perfection. It means helping students become more thoughtful, more responsive, and more connected to their work.

Critique is important. It helps students see. But revision helps them do something with that insight. It is where ideas are tested and strengthened. It is where uncertainty becomes clarity. And it is where students begin to take ownership of their process.

If we want students to grow as creative thinkers, we cannot stop at critique. We need to teach them how to keep going. Revision is where that happens.

CPAD Summer Media Recommendations and Reviews #1

cad256Leave a comment

CPAD Summer Media Recommendations and Reviews

Welcome to the new Summer Recommendation and Reviews article series where our CPAD community chat about some of their favorite media. Enjoy your Summer!

~CPAD

 

Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World Genre: Historical Action

Summer Review #1 by Peter Rea

 

Starring: Russell Crowe, Paul Bettany

I’m often a contrarian. We play video games and I look for a spec that nobody is playing, and I try to go see what the deal is. Is it underpowered? Do people not like it? Is there some hidden thing that people are missing that maybe I can figure out? With my favorite movie, this is not the case. The film that I love the most and I believe is the greatest film ever made are one in the same: Lawrence of Arabia. It’s a sweeping epic starring Peter O’Toole, Omar Sharif, and Alec Guinness and it is the most splendid visual and dramatic piece ever made. It also holds the distinction of being the only film to ever win Best Picture without having a female speaking role in the film. A feature (the speaking role, not the Best Picture win) that it shares with Master and Commander, and it is not the only one.

It’s been a while since I’ve seen a film that has such apathy towards its viewer as to whether the person who is watching the film actually cares about what is happening. This is, from the beginning, a film about dudes doing stuff on a boat. That’s what they do. You are watching dudes do stuff on a boat without understanding why and, Lord knows, not understanding what they’re talking about. There is no long introduction about vocabulary or an explanation about why the twelve-year-olds are the ones giving orders to grown men. I don’t think the film even cares. You’re just supposed to nod your head and say “Yeah! Go down the port side at arms for a keelhaul! That sounds like what we should do!” We’ve seen this before, mostly in space movies like Apollo 13 or The Martian, but those films, especially The Martian, get around that by having someone in the room who needs stuff explained to them (most of the time it’s Jeff Daniels) to act as the audience to have Daniel Glover go around the room with a pen and a stapler to explain astrophysics. Master and Commander does not care; just nod your head and feel intelligent when you figure something out.

The actual plot of the film is Moby Dick, except it’s an enemy boat instead of a whale. Russel Crowe becomes obsessive about chasing the French vessel Acheron across the Pacific Ocean. He’s outgunned and outmanned, but he must do it for the empire! A lot of the film is episodic, they fight, they stop at some islands and stuff happens, the wind won’t go, and stuff happens, and so forth, and whether you’ll enjoy this movie relies almost entirely on whether you care about the characters and their interactions with one another throughout the middle of the film. How many shouting matches between Paul Bettany, who plays the ship’s surgeon, and Russell Crowe do you care to hear on whether this is a glorious mission or a fool-hardy errand that is going to get them killed? Do you care about the twenty-minute side-quest Paul Bettany goes on to document the wildlife of the Galapagos Islands? How about multiple dinner scenes where people get drunk on the boat and tell jokes? Maybe? At a two and a quarter hour runtime, it doesn’t overly stay it’s welcome too much.

This comes off as overly critical, but it’s not. Having the courage to make a film like this (I have not read the books) and just make the movie that you want to make is something that real filmmakers do. This messing around with four hundred edits to make it more palatable to a wider audience leads to Suicide Squads and Wonder Woman 1984s as opposed to Ladybirds and Master and Commanders. By and large, it works. Not always, but it works. You feel like you are coming along for the ride. You care about the minor characters’ fates, even though I don’t remember a single one of their names ten days after watching the film. You want them to win and often laugh when there’s a joke and gasp when something bad happens. Crowe is splendid in this, Bettany a little less so, but he suffices, and it’s Crowe’s movie. That’s when the film works best when he is strutting around in his absurd hat, taking other people’s ideas for his own, and executing brilliant boat [stuff], cause that’s what we all came here to watch. Not quite a classic, but certainly something that will work its way into the rotation when I’m looking for a movie to watch.

Using Student Self-Assessment Effectively

cad256Leave a comment

Using Student Self-Assessment Effectively

-Cookie Redding, CPAD Faculty

When students are focused only on their grade or what you think of their work, they miss something important. They miss the chance to really understand their own creative process, to see where they are growing, and to figure out what they want to get better at. One of the best ways to shift that focus is to build in self-assessment.

When it is done well, self-assessment helps students slow down and actually think about what they are doing. It gives them a moment to check in with themselves, to notice what they are learning, how they are approaching the work, and what they might want to focus on next. It helps build a sense of independence, self-awareness, and creative confidence. But for it to really work, it has to be more than an afterthought. A quick “how do you think you did” at the end of a project is not going to be enough. When you weave self-assessment in with care, it can lead to deeper learning and help you respond to what students are actually experiencing, not just what you imagine they are getting out of it.

In creative classes, students deal with a lot of uncertainty. They are always wondering if their work is good enough, if they are doing it “right,” if it will meet the expectations. Self-assessment helps take some of that energy and point it inward, instead of just trying to figure out what you want. It teaches students to pay attention to their own process and decisions. Over time, it helps them develop habits of reflection that stick around long after the course is over. It makes it easier for them to see both their strengths and the areas they want to work on. It gives them better language to talk about their ideas and their work. It shows them how effort, process, and outcomes are connected. And maybe just as important, it helps them move away from always chasing approval from someone else. In fields like visual art, design, theatre, dance, and architecture, this kind of reflection is already a natural part of the process. Self-assessment fits right in. It is not an extra task. It is part of making creative work.

Self-assessment is not about grading yourself. It is not about trying to guess what grade you will get or pretending to be humble. It is about asking real questions. What was I trying to do with this project? What choices did I make along the way? What feels strong? What would I change if I had more time? And it is not something that has to wait until the end of a project either. You can bring it in earlier and make it part of the creative process itself.

It works best when it is part of the regular rhythm of the class. You can have students reflect after they finish a project, checking in on what worked, what did not, and what they would do next time. You can have them reflect midway through a project, giving them a chance to regroup before critique or revisions. At the start of the course, you can invite them to name their goals or comfort zones. After giving feedback, you can have students take a breath and reflect before they dive into revising. The more often they do it, the more natural it starts to feel, and the more it becomes part of how they work.

The key to good self-assessment is asking better questions. Open-ended questions can sometimes lead to vague or surface-level answers, so it helps to give students some structure to work with. You might ask about their process, like what steps they took or where they ran into challenges. You might ask about decision-making, like why they chose a particular format or approach. You might ask about the final outcome, like what they feel good about and what they would want to revisit. You might focus on growth, asking what they learned about their creative process and where they see themselves improving. You can even have them set a goal for their next project based on what they notice.

You do not have to turn self-assessment into a big, complicated assignment. In fact, it works better when it stays short and consistent. It might be a quick written reflection at the end of a project or before a critique. It could be a simple checklist or Google Form with a few questions. If your course already has journals or sketchbooks, you can weave self-assessment into that work. You can have students fill out a quick critique prep sheet before they present their work to their peers. If you have a smaller or more flexible class, sometimes a short one-on-one chat or a voice note can work even better than writing.

Students are usually more willing to be honest when they know that self-assessment is not about getting graded or being penalized. It helps to be clear from the start. You are not looking for students to defend their work or explain away problems. You are looking for honest reflection. You are not looking for perfection. You are looking for awareness, growth, and thoughtfulness. It also helps to normalize the idea that every piece of work has both strengths and areas for improvement. That is part of making art. That is part of learning.

One of the best ways to get even more out of self-assessment is to connect it with feedback. You can have students reflect on how the feedback they received lines up with what they already noticed about their work. You can ask them what feedback surprised them, what they expected to hear, how the feedback relates to their own reflections, and what changes they plan to make. When you do that, feedback is not just a one-way street. It becomes a conversation between the student, their work, and the people engaging with it.

At the end of the day, teaching creative work is not just about helping students make something good. It is about helping them learn how to think about what they make. Self-assessment gives them a tool they can carry forward into their next project, their next class, and their own creative life beyond school. It is not about making students grade themselves. It is about building habits of reflection that lead to deeper learning and stronger, more thoughtful work. When you build it into your course with care, self-assessment stops being an extra step. It becomes part of how students learn to create, think, and grow.