CPAD Shares #9: Increasing Student Motivation

C-PAD Shares #9, May 2023 

Featured Theme: Increasing Student Motivation 

 

 

At the start of every course, a recurring teaching challenge looms fresh: How can I connect to these students? How interested and motivated are they, and what can I do to strengthen their motivation? These two articles and the Solve a Teaching Problem site at Carnegie Mellon provide solid advice for meeting this common challenge knowledgably. 

 

Five Keys to Motivating Students 

 

Faculty Focus, June 6, 2018 

By Maryellen Weimer, PhD 

Professor emerita of teaching and learning at Penn State Berks and winner of Penn State’s Milton S. Eisenhower award for distinguished teaching in 2005. 

Article reading time: 4 minutes 

 

 

This distinguished scholar and author does us all a great service by summarizing five generalizations and their implications from Paul Pintrich’s meta-analysis on motivation, “A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts”.1 Dr. Weimer affirms the authoritative value of the article, calling it “…the piece I most often see referenced when it comes to what’s known about student motivation. Subsequent research continues to confirm the generalizations reported in it.”2
 

The first generalization deals with a student’s beliefs regarding their own competence and how adaptable those beliefs are. Simply put, motivation follows belief. The more strongly students believe they possess required abilities leading to success, the greater their effort, persistence, and other motivated behaviors. The author notes the key implications that Pintrich identified as flowing from this generalization: 

 

  • Implication 1: Teachers must strive to provide accurate and specific feedback. 
  • Implication 2: Task difficulty needs to hit a “sweet spot”—challenging, but neither too difficult nor too easy, both of which are demotivating. 

 

Read on to learn the other four generalizations and the teaching implications associated with them. 

 

 

 

Solve a Teaching Problem: Students Lack Interest or Motivation 

 

Carnegie Mellon University, The Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence & Educational Innovation 

 

In a unique and highly commendable approach, the Eberly Center has created a truly useful resource here, the Solve a Teaching Problem site. Intended as a supplement to their one-on-one consultations, this diagnostic site is loaded with practical advice tailored to particular aspects of common teaching challenges. 

In Step 1, you identify the problem you are encountering. In Step 2, you identify one or more possible causes or reasons from the list they provide. When you follow a reason link, you come to a Step 3 page that describes strategies proven to help with this issue for this reason. By exploring multiple causes and the several strategies provided for each, you can customize a robust solution to your teaching challenges. 

 

For example, if we have identified that students lack interest or motivation, six possible reasons or causes are provided. If we follow the first one, that “students see little value in the course or its content”, we see seven potential strategies for dealing with this issue, including “clearly articulate learning goals” and “connect to student’s personal interests.” For each of those, in a single paragraph of about 150 words, the relevant learning principle(s) are provided, along with several examples of how this strategy could be applied in a variety of academic disciplines. 

 

Really, you have to see this one! Take a minute and follow the trails wherever they lead. You might find new insight and excellent advice that solve your teaching problem. 

 

 

Students’ Motivation Generates, Directs, and Sustains What They Do to Learn 

 

Kennesaw State University, Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning 

Article reading time: 7 minutes
 

 

The article asserts that there is a common disconnect between what instructors believe motivates student learning versus what actually motivates them. The bottom line? Three factors, working together, are what drive motivation: goals/values, self-efficacy, and a supportive environment. 

 

Goals and Values 

Whereas instructors want students to strive toward mastery goals or learning goals, students tend to focus on performance goals. How do we bridge this divide? The author argues that emphasizing a performance mindset is the wrong approach; instead, instructors should “stack” three kinds of values (attainment, intrinsic, and instrumental) that serve to heighten student motivation, facilitate mastery learning, and position students to reach their performance goals. 

 

Self-Efficacy
Echoing a key finding already discussed above, student motivation increases the more they believe they will perform successfully. The instructor’s task is to help students move from a “predetermined” mindset to a “growth” mindset. 

 

Supportive Environment 

Also consider your class environment. Do they know that you care about them and their learning? Do they feel that they can reach out to you for help? Is there a growing sense of community in the classroom over time? An unsupportive environment can really kill motivation. 

 

The article concludes with several strategies to establish value and enhance student self-efficacy. 

 

***************************** 

 

That’s it for this month, and this academic year. The next edition of C-PAD Shares will come out In September. Hopefully you found something you can use to heighten student motivation in your next class, whether this summer or this fall. 

 

 

Weimer, M. (2019, November 25). Five keys to motivating students. Faculty Focus | Higher Ed Teaching & Learning. Retrieved April 19, 2023, from https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/effective-classroom-management/five-keys-student-motivation/ 

 

Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95 (4), 667-686. 

 

CPAD Shares #8: Ending the Semester Well

Featured Theme: Ending the Semester Well 

 

 

What is that light at the end of the tunnel? Ah, the end of the semester, a time for faculty and students to set their burdens down and get some much-needed rest. True enough, but it is also a particularly important juncture for faculty and students alike. After all, this is the moment the semester has been building towards all along. Has the student transformation succeeded? Have they grown and developed as we hoped? Both teachers and students need to take stock of that. Months ago, faculty set out to do an important job well. How well did they do? How might they do even better in the future? 

 

The semester shouldn’t just “expire”—it should end well. These three resources can help you make the most of this opportunity, largely through personal, informal activities, augmented by traditional, formal evaluation. 

 

 

End of Semester Tips: How to Get Students to Love Your Course 

 

By Dr. Joanne Ricevuto, Assistant Vice President for Instructional Success, Harcum College, December 2, 2021. From Fierce Education. 

 

Estimated article reading time: 3 minutes 

 

Dr. Ricevuto provides quite a bit of practical value in under three minutes. Acknowledging the shortcomings inherent to most end-of-semester teaching evaluations, the author offers seven solid alternative ideas to get the feedback you really need. A second goal is fostering student reflection on their now-completed journey and ending the course on a positive note. 

 

Many of the activity options involve free, readily available software that is easy to use, such as Google forms, Twitter, or iMovie. Here are just three of them:
 

  • Long answer Course Reflection Google form (follow the link to copy the form) 
  • Students write a letter to future students of the course to set their expectations, highlight their favorite aspects, and offer advice 
  • Students write an “exit ticket” of the best take-away from your class using a Twitter hashtag 

 

 

 

 

Strategies for Increasing SRTE Response Rates 

 

Schreyer Institute for Teaching Excellence, The Pennsylvania State University 

 

No discussion of end-of-semester activity at Penn State would be complete without advice related to the SRTE. The Schreyer Institute took an interesting approach here: they asked faculty with a 70% or greater response rate and at least 30 students in their classes to explain how they do it. Intriguing! A number of best practices emerged, organized around ten topic areas.
 

The content here consists of faculty statements of practice, typically a paragraph in length. You can quickly learn one or more tips you might want to experiment with in your upcoming evaluation. 

 

Ending the Semester 

 

Center for New Designs in Learning and Scholarship, Georgetown University 

Estimated article reading time: 4 minutes 

 

Given the inevitable exhaustion you and your students face by semester’s end, it can be tempting to take the path of least resistance in wrapping up your course. But the author asserts that one last thoughtful push can transform a mere course ending into something more meaningful and lasting. The author’s advice is organized on a “Looking Back—Gathering Feedback—Looking Forward” framework. 

 

Looking Back—While you have probably been fostering reflection and integration all along, the final stretch of your course provides unique vantage points for both. 

 

  • Reflection on the significance of the class experience and course content (see the article link for more information about the pedagogical power of reflection) 
  • A final integration of course content, drawing connections between seemingly disparate pieces of course material 

 

Gathering Feedback—In a similar vein as Dr. Ricevuto (above), augment your SRTE feedback with your own informal method. Choose any format you like and ask the questions that really matter. This can even take the form of open (i.e., non-defensive) conversation about the successes and shortcomings of the course. 

 

Looking Forward—One way to end well is to treat it as a new beginning. The author provides examples that meaningfully connect a course to the future endeavors of your students. For majors, you can explain how your course has prepared them for the courses to follow and “preview” how those courses will build upon your foundation. For non-majors, you can connect the coursework to students’ lives more generally. 

CPAD Shares Issue #7: Backward Design

Featured Resource: Backward Design

 

 

Regardless of your academic discipline, at some point you will likely be confronted with a challenging task: the need to design (or significantly revise) a course. We all want our courses to be the best they can be. One option is to “go it alone”— simply rely on your own experience and instinct to make the myriad of decisions required; another option is to use a recognized approach for guidance.

 

One excellent planning resource you should consider is the Understanding by Design (UbD) framework, which has solidified a reputation as a benchmark approach in the last 25 years. Resting on a strong foundation of theoretical research in cognitive psychology and the results of student achievement studies, UbD’s two key ideas are contained in the title: a focus on teaching and assessing for understanding and learning transfer, and the logic of designing curriculum “backwards” from those ends.

 

What is Understanding by Design? Author Jay McTighe explains.

Hawker Brownlow Education video

7 minutes

 

The first edition of Understanding by Design was published in 1998, co-authored by the late Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe, and an expanded second edition was released in 2005. In this video, McTighe clearly and succinctly explains the essence of the approach in under four minutes. We particularly like the advice he proceeds to offer to first-time users of the framework: 1) think big; 2) start small; 3) go for an early win.

 

Backward Design

 

By Erin Stapleton-Corcoran, Instructional Designer with the Center for the Advancement of Teaching Excellence, University of Illinois Chicago, January 25, 2023.

 

If McTighe’s overview of UbD intrigued you, then this site is ideal for learning more. In scouring the web for excellent primers on UbD, this recently-created resource topped them all. The author briefly summarizes the UbD course design stages and components, augmented by a good use of visuals.

Stage 1: Identify Desired Results

  1. Identify the Big Ideas
  2. Transform the Big Ideas into Essential Questions
  3. Craft learning objectives
  4. Prioritize content
  5. Determine knowledge and skill understandings

Stage 2: Determine Appropriate Assessments

  1. Apply the three-layer conceptual model
  2. Identify assessment evidence across the Six Facets of Understanding
  3. Identify the mix of formative and summative assessments

· Stage 3: Formulate a Learning Plan

  1. Plan the sequence of learning activities (using WHERETO)
  2. Articulate how you will teach for understanding

 

The final consideration is ensuring that Stages 1,2, and 3 are in alignment.

 

Resources from McTighe & Associates Consulting

 

Resource section of McTighe & Associates site

 

If you are interested in experimenting with the approach or would like to learn more, this is the site for you. Here you can:

  • Explore guiding examples
  • Download the UbD Template and other resource files
  • Review essential questions by subject area
  • Get help for assessment design
  • Watch informative videos
  • Read relevant articles

 

If you have questions or would like to learn more about the UbD framework, contact Bill Rose in the Office of Digital learning at bmr1@psu.edu.

 

 

Join the conversation on our website!